Don’t forget the small communities when transitioning to renewables

However, while everyone in Australia will benefit from the transition to renewable energy, the costs of this transition will be unequally distributed. As I showed in a recent report, the loss of primary industries in the three areas most dependent on fossil fuel extraction (Mackay, Central Queensland and the Hunter Valley) will have devastating impacts on local economies and the communities that depend on them.

If we don’t have credible transition plans, these communities stand to lose $66 million in weekly wages for a total loss of $3.45 bn annually in three discrete regional communities. This loss is particularly acute as the next four of the largest five industries in these locations are all dependent on a primary industry employing workers who spend back into local retail, hospitality, and other consumptive businesses.


While some less scrupulous observers might interpret this as a reason to keep our collective heads in the sand and maintain fossil fuel jobs at all costs, the harsh realities of what these communities stand to lose is actually the opposite. What these communities need isn’t a denial of their realities or cosplay coal warriors: they need to have a seat at the table to ensure that they can live, work and thrive in the post-carbon economy.

This approach isn’t easy, but there is plenty of evidence to suggest this approach it worth it. Overwhelmingly, coal communities are in favor of transition, and no one knows better what these regional communities need more than the workers, local business owners and community leaders who call them home.

A recent review of transition plans found that the best outcomes came when local communities were adequately involved in decision-making, and the approach was pre-emptive of changes rather than reactive to closures.

Closer to home, we already have a good model to build off and ensure that communities are centered in our transition plans and their associated decision-making processes: the Latrobe Valley Authority.

Established in 2017 following the closure of the Hazelwood power station near Morwell in Victoria’s Gippsland region, the Latrobe Valley Authority was created following a campaign led by local community members, trade unionists and environmental activists to save the valley. This state government authority has since led the way with community involvement at the forefront of its operations.


This body not only consults the community on decision-making, but it also provides resources and support for community-led initiatives, from business creation to mine rehabilitation.

It is time we learned from both international and domestic examples, and begin to build more institutions that place community at the heart of decision-making. By creating a national transition authority that supports, coordinates and collaborates with regional bodies like the Latrobe Valley Authority, the government could go a long way to supporting community led transition plans.

Most of all, this shifts the focus from the well-meaning, but nonetheless profit driven billionaires back to the communities who will be affected by this transition. If the benefits of this transition are to be shared equally, then we must start by giving community members a seat at the table.

Shirley Jackson is a senior fellow, industry policy, at Per Capita think tank.

About the author


Leave a Comment